What role for overriding mandatory provisions of third countries in conflicts of laws relating to rights in rem in moveable non-cultural property?

Autores/as

Pietro Franzina
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-2281

Sinopsis

SUMMARY: I. THE CURRENT REFLECTION ON A POSSIBLE EU INSTRUMENT ON THE LAW GOVERNING RIGHTS In rem.— II. THE UNILATERALIST FLAVOUR OF THE LEX REI SITAE RULE: IS THERE ANY ROOM LEFT FOR OVERRIDING MANDATORY PROVISIONS IN THE FIELD OF RIGHTS In rem?— III. THE RECOVERY OF ILLEGALLY TRANSFERRED NON-CULTURAL OBJECTS.— IV. THE ENFORCEMENT OF DUTIES PERTAINING TO THE MOVEABLE ASSETS IN QUESTION.— V. CONCLUDING REMARKS.

Descargas

Próximamente

24 October 2024

Licencia

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Cómo citar

Franzina, P. (2024) “What role for overriding mandatory provisions of third countries in conflicts of laws relating to rights in rem in moveable non-cultural property?”, in Font-Mas, M. (ed.) Private International Law on Rights in rem in the European Union. Derecho internacional privado sobre derechos reales en la Unión Europea. Madrid, España: Marcial Pons, Ediciones Jurídicas y Sociales (Monografías Jurídicas), pp. 469–476. doi:10.37417/PILRIRUE/19.